Cleveland's Doppler Cartel
My childhood hero Dick "wooly bear man" Goddard, friend to all dogs and cats, is in the global warming denier camp. So says an extenisve expose into Cleveland's television weather guys that was given front page space in Wednesday's Plain Dealer. The list goes on to other well know purveyors of the Doppler such as Mark Johnson, Andre Bernier, John Loufman and Mark Nolan, (no longer doing weather). Oddly enough I didn't see any women on the list.
The concept of the story is actually kind of humorous. At first it would seem that this position would contradict the duties that local meteorologists fulfill on a daily basis. If you take a step back and consider that there is one glaring fact that exempts the Doppler cartel from being rational about global warming, they are not scientists. Sure each of the weathermen carries a seal form the AMS but, aren't they really giving a glorified weather Power Point presentation every night?
What would be really interesting is to see what the correlation is between the views of members of the weather underground that aligns their views on global warming. Such an investigation woudl be fodder for the guys at Freakonomics. There are a variety of explanations for their skepticism given, from complete denial the earth is indeed heating up to the thesis presented in Michael Crichton's book State of Fear.
What would be really interesting is to see what the correlation is between the views of members of the weather underground that aligns their views on global warming. Such an investigation woudl be fodder for the guys at Freakonomics. There are a variety of explanations for their skepticism given, from complete denial the earth is indeed heating up to the thesis presented in Michael Crichton's book State of Fear.
Bernier said local meteorologists "are just more practical" and not swayed by the opportunity for more grant money to do more research proving climate change.Using Crichton's work to refute global warming is common among a certain persuasion of political minds. The only problem is that Crichton was not a scientist. Scientists submit their work to peer review which Crichton did not do. This article gives the impression that the large sample of weather broadcasters in Cleveland and across the country are in the same camp ideological camp. Their focus on presenting the very short term outlook of weather as opposed to long term climate has apparently swayed their opinions, almost like a badge of honor. Next up, does too much time in front of a chromokey impact human logic?
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment